Multi-LLM deliberation framework for strategic decisions through pressure-based expert consultation
View on GitHubathola/claude-night-market
attune
January 25, 2026
Select agents to install to:
npx add-skill https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market/blob/main/plugins/attune/skills/war-room/SKILL.md -a claude-code --skill war-roomInstallation paths:
.claude/skills/war-room/## Table of Contents - [Overview](#overview) - [Reversibility-Based Routing](#reversibility-based-routing) - [When to Use](#when-to-use) - [When NOT to Use](#when-not-to-use) - [Expert Panel](#expert-panel) - [Deliberation Protocol](#deliberation-protocol) - [Integration](#integration) - [Usage](#usage) - [Output](#output) - [Configuration](#configuration) - [Related Skills](#related-skills) # War Room Skill Orchestrate multi-LLM deliberation for complex strategic decisions. ## Overview The War Room convenes multiple AI experts to analyze problems from diverse perspectives, challenge assumptions through adversarial review, and synthesize optimal approaches under the guidance of a Supreme Commander. ### Philosophy > "The trick is that there is no trick. The power of intelligence stems from our vast diversity, not from any single, perfect principle." > - Marvin Minsky, Society of Mind ## Reversibility-Based Routing Before deliberation, assess the **Reversibility Score (RS)** to determine appropriate resource allocation: ``` RS = (Reversal Cost + Time Lock-In + Blast Radius + Information Loss + Reputation Impact) / 25 ``` | RS Range | Type | Mode | Resources | |----------|------|------|-----------| | 0.04 - 0.40 | **Type 2** | Express | 1 expert, < 2 min | | 0.41 - 0.60 | **Type 1B** | Lightweight | 3 experts, 5-10 min | | 0.61 - 0.80 | **Type 1A** | Full Council | 7 experts, 15-30 min | | 0.81 - 1.00 | **Type 1A+** | Delphi | 7 experts, 30-60 min | **Quick Heuristics:** - Can be A/B tested? → Type 2 - Requires data migration? → Type 1 - Public commitment required? → Type 1A+ See `modules/reversibility-assessment.md` for full scoring guide. ## When to Use - Architectural decisions with major trade-offs - Multi-stakeholder problems requiring diverse perspectives - High-stakes choices with significant consequences (RS > 0.60) - Novel problems without clear precedent - When brainstorming produces multiple strong competing approaches ## When NOT to Use - S