prowler-commit

## Critical Rules

- ALWAYS use conventional-commits format: `type(scope): description`
- ALWAYS keep the first line under 72 characters
- ALWAYS ask for user confirmation before committing
- NEVER be overly specific (avoid counts like "6 subsections", "3 files")
- NEVER include implementation details in the title
- NEVER use `-n` flag unless user explicitly requests it
- NEVER use `git push --force` or `git push -f` (destructive, rewrites history)
- NEVER proactively offer to commit - wait for user to explicitly request it

---

## Commit Format

```
type(scope): concise description

- Key change 1
- Key change 2
- Key change 3
```

### Types

| Type | Use When |
|------|----------|
| `feat` | New feature or functionality |
| `fix` | Bug fix |
| `docs` | Documentation only |
| `chore` | Maintenance, dependencies, configs |
| `refactor` | Code change without feature/fix |
| `test` | Adding or updating tests |
| `perf` | Performance improvement |
| `style` | Formatting, no code change |

### Scopes

| Scope | When |
|-------|------|
| `api` | Changes in `api/` |
| `ui` | Changes in `ui/` |
| `sdk` | Changes in `prowler/` |
| `mcp` | Changes in `mcp_server/` |
| `skills` | Changes in `skills/` |
| `ci` | Changes in `.github/` |
| `docs` | Changes in `docs/` |
| *omit* | Multiple scopes or root-level |

---

## Good vs Bad Examples

### Title Line

```
# GOOD - Concise and clear
feat(api): add provider connection retry logic
fix(ui): resolve dashboard loading state
chore(skills): add Celery documentation
docs: update installation guide

# BAD - Too specific or verbose
feat(api): add provider connection retry logic with exponential backoff and jitter (3 retries max)
chore(skills): add comprehensive Celery documentation covering 8 topics
fix(ui): fix the bug in dashboard component on line 45
```

### Body (Bullet Points)

```
# GOOD - High-level changes
- Add retry mechanism for failed connections
- Document task composition patterns
- Expand configuration reference

# B