proposal-review

# Proposal Review

Methodically review proposals by chunking content, predicting feedback, and producing actionable output for the proposer.

## Workflow

```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. INTAKE: Read entire proposal, identify source format    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  2. CHUNK: Split into reviewable sections (smart hybrid)    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  3. REVIEW LOOP: For each chunk:                            │
│     • Present chunk content                                 │
│     • Predict 3-4 likely reactions                          │
│     • Use AskUserQuestion for feedback                      │
│     • Record response                                       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  4. SYNTHESIZE: Compile feedback, infer overall sentiment   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  5. OUTPUT: Generate feedback document matching source      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```

## Phase 1: Intake

Read the entire proposal. Identify:

- **Source format**: Local file, GitHub PR/issue/gist, Google Doc export, etc.
- **Structure**: Headers, sections, numbered lists, or flowing prose
- **Length**: Estimate chunk count (aim for 3-8 chunks for typical proposals)

Do not summarize or share initial impressions. Proceed directly to chunking.

## Phase 2: Chunking Strategy

Use smart hybrid chunking:

| Proposal Structure | Chunking Approach |
|-------------------|-------------------|
| Clear headers/sections | One chunk per major section |
| Large section (>500 words) | Split at natural paragraph breaks |
| Small adjacent sections (<100 words each) | Merge into single chunk |
| Numbered lists of items | Group 3-5 related items per chunk |
| Flowing prose without structure | Split at topic transitions (~300-400 words) |

**Chunk ordering**: Present