Requirements prioritization techniques including MoSCoW, Kano Model, WSJF (SAFe), and Wiegers' Value/Cost/Risk matrix. Provides scoring frameworks, trade-off analysis, and priority visualization. Use when ranking requirements by business value, customer impact, or implementation efficiency.
View on GitHubmelodic-software/claude-code-plugins
requirements-elicitation
plugins/requirements-elicitation/skills/prioritization-methods/SKILL.md
January 21, 2026
Select agents to install to:
npx add-skill https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/blob/main/plugins/requirements-elicitation/skills/prioritization-methods/SKILL.md -a claude-code --skill prioritization-methodsInstallation paths:
.claude/skills/prioritization-methods/# Requirements Prioritization Methods
Comprehensive guide to prioritization techniques for requirements and features.
## When to Use This Skill
**Keywords:** prioritization, priority, MoSCoW, Kano model, WSJF, weighted shortest job first, value cost risk, Wiegers, priority matrix, must have should have, delighters, basic needs, performance features, cost of delay
**Use this skill when:**
- Ranking requirements by business value
- Choosing between competing features
- Allocating limited development capacity
- Communicating priority decisions to stakeholders
- Balancing customer satisfaction vs implementation effort
- Making trade-off decisions in product planning
## Prioritization Methods Overview
| Method | Best For | Complexity | Stakeholder Input |
| ------ | -------- | ---------- | ----------------- |
| **MoSCoW** | Quick categorization, MVP scope | Low | Low |
| **Kano Model** | Customer satisfaction analysis | Medium | High (surveys) |
| **WSJF** | Agile/SAFe environments, flow optimization | Medium | Medium |
| **Wiegers' Matrix** | Quantitative value/cost analysis | High | Medium |
| **Opportunity Scoring** | JTBD-aligned prioritization | Medium | High (surveys) |
## MoSCoW Method
### Categories
```yaml
moscow:
must:
definition: "Non-negotiable for this release"
criteria:
- "System won't work without it"
- "Legal/regulatory requirement"
- "Core to value proposition"
typical_percentage: "60% of effort"
should:
definition: "Important but not critical"
criteria:
- "Significant value, but workarounds exist"
- "Key stakeholder expectations"
- "Competitive parity"
typical_percentage: "20% of effort"
could:
definition: "Nice to have if time permits"
criteria:
- "Enhances user experience"
- "Low effort, incremental value"
- "Differentiator but not essential"
typical_percentage: "20% of effort"
wont:
definition: "Explicitly out of scope for now"
crite