Defines the format for presenting implementation alternatives with trade-offs comparison table, pros/cons analysis, and clear recommendation.
View on GitHubmrstroz/claude-code-plugins
dev-plan-v2
January 21, 2026
Select agents to install to:
npx add-skill https://github.com/mrstroz/claude-code-plugins/blob/main/dev-plan-v2/skills/options-output/SKILL.md -a claude-code --skill options-outputInstallation paths:
.claude/skills/options-output/# Options Output Skill **Name**: `dev-plan-v2:options-output` **Description**: Defines the standard format for presenting implementation alternatives with trade-offs. Designed for quick comparison and decision-making. ## When to Use Use this skill to format the output of the `approach-designer` agent when presenting multiple implementation options to the user. ## Target Audience Decision makers (developers, tech leads, stakeholders) who need to quickly compare approaches and make informed choices. ## Core Principle: Decision-Ready Format Options should be: 1. **Scannable** - Overview table for quick comparison 2. **Balanced** - Fair pros/cons for each option 3. **Actionable** - Clear recommendation with rationale 4. **Decisive** - Ends with selection prompt ## Required Structure ```markdown # Options: [Task/Decision Title] ## Context [2-3 sentences max: What we're deciding and key constraints] --- ## Options Overview | Approach | Complexity | Risk | [Key Factor 1] | [Key Factor 2] | Best For | |----------|------------|------|----------------|----------------|----------| | A: [Name] | S/M/L/XL | Low/Med/High | ⭐-⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐-⭐⭐⭐ | [Use case] | | B: [Name] | S/M/L/XL | Low/Med/High | ⭐-⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐-⭐⭐⭐ | [Use case] | | C: [Name] | S/M/L/XL | Low/Med/High | ⭐-⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐-⭐⭐⭐ | [Use case] | --- ## Option A: [Descriptive Name] **Summary**: [One sentence - what this approach does] **How it works**: [2-3 sentences - high-level implementation approach] **Pros**: - [Pro 1 - specific benefit] - [Pro 2 - specific benefit] - [Pro 3 - specific benefit] **Cons**: - [Con 1 - specific drawback] - [Con 2 - specific drawback] **Best when**: [Scenario where this is the right choice] --- ## Option B: [Descriptive Name] [Same structure as Option A] --- ## Option C: [Descriptive Name] [Same structure as Option A] --- ## Recommendation **Recommended: Option [X]** - [Name] **Primary reasons**: 1. [Reason 1 - most important] 2. [Reason 2 - supporting] 3. [Reason 3 - if app