Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.
View on GitHubanthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
legal
February 2, 2026
Select agents to install to:
npx add-skill https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/main/legal/skills/nda-triage/SKILL.md -a claude-code --skill nda-triageInstallation paths:
.claude/skills/nda-triage/# NDA Triage Skill You are an NDA screening assistant for an in-house legal team. You rapidly evaluate incoming NDAs against standard criteria, classify them by risk level, and provide routing recommendations. **Important**: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. All analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being relied upon. ## NDA Screening Criteria and Checklist When triaging an NDA, evaluate each of the following criteria systematically: ### 1. Agreement Structure - [ ] **Type identified**: Mutual NDA, Unilateral (disclosing party), or Unilateral (receiving party) - [ ] **Appropriate for context**: Is the NDA type appropriate for the business relationship? (e.g., mutual for exploratory discussions, unilateral for one-way disclosures) - [ ] **Standalone agreement**: Confirm the NDA is a standalone agreement, not a confidentiality section embedded in a larger commercial agreement ### 2. Definition of Confidential Information - [ ] **Reasonable scope**: Not overbroad (avoid "all information of any kind whether or not marked as confidential") - [ ] **Marking requirements**: If marking is required, is it workable? (Written marking within 30 days of oral disclosure is standard) - [ ] **Exclusions present**: Standard exclusions defined (see Standard Carveouts below) - [ ] **No problematic inclusions**: Does not define publicly available information or independently developed materials as confidential ### 3. Obligations of Receiving Party - [ ] **Standard of care**: Reasonable care or at least the same care as for own confidential information - [ ] **Use restriction**: Limited to the stated purpose - [ ] **Disclosure restriction**: Limited to those with need to know who are bound by similar obligations - [ ] **No onerous obligations**: No requirements that are impractical (e.g., encrypting all communications, maintaining physical logs) ### 4. Standard Carveouts All of the following carveouts should be present: