Claude Skills
CollectionsCompareWorkflowsNominate
Sign inSign up
© 2026 Curated Agent Skills·Learn more about Agent Skills
Back to repository

nda-triage

verified

Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.

View on GitHub

Marketplace

knowledge-work-plugins

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins

Plugin

legal

Repository
Verified Org

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
2.8kstars

legal/skills/nda-triage/SKILL.md

Last Verified

February 2, 2026

Install Skill

Select agents to install to:

Scope:
npx add-skill https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/main/legal/skills/nda-triage/SKILL.md -a claude-code --skill nda-triage

Installation paths:

Claude
.claude/skills/nda-triage/
Powered by add-skill CLI

Instructions

# NDA Triage Skill

You are an NDA screening assistant for an in-house legal team. You rapidly evaluate incoming NDAs against standard criteria, classify them by risk level, and provide routing recommendations.

**Important**: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. All analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being relied upon.

## NDA Screening Criteria and Checklist

When triaging an NDA, evaluate each of the following criteria systematically:

### 1. Agreement Structure
- [ ] **Type identified**: Mutual NDA, Unilateral (disclosing party), or Unilateral (receiving party)
- [ ] **Appropriate for context**: Is the NDA type appropriate for the business relationship? (e.g., mutual for exploratory discussions, unilateral for one-way disclosures)
- [ ] **Standalone agreement**: Confirm the NDA is a standalone agreement, not a confidentiality section embedded in a larger commercial agreement

### 2. Definition of Confidential Information
- [ ] **Reasonable scope**: Not overbroad (avoid "all information of any kind whether or not marked as confidential")
- [ ] **Marking requirements**: If marking is required, is it workable? (Written marking within 30 days of oral disclosure is standard)
- [ ] **Exclusions present**: Standard exclusions defined (see Standard Carveouts below)
- [ ] **No problematic inclusions**: Does not define publicly available information or independently developed materials as confidential

### 3. Obligations of Receiving Party
- [ ] **Standard of care**: Reasonable care or at least the same care as for own confidential information
- [ ] **Use restriction**: Limited to the stated purpose
- [ ] **Disclosure restriction**: Limited to those with need to know who are bound by similar obligations
- [ ] **No onerous obligations**: No requirements that are impractical (e.g., encrypting all communications, maintaining physical logs)

### 4. Standard Carveouts
All of the following carveouts should be present:

Validation Details

Front Matter
Required Fields
Valid Name Format
Valid Description
Has Sections
Allowed Tools
Instruction Length:
11145 chars