multi-perspective-analysis

# Multi-Perspective Analysis Skill

A systematic methodology for examining propositions through dynamically generated expert perspectives.

## When to Invoke This Skill

- User presents a proposition, thesis, or idea for examination
- User asks "what do experts think about", "different perspectives on", "analyze this from multiple angles"
- User wants to validate assumptions or find blindspots
- User mentions "devil's advocate", "critique", "challenge this idea"
- User requests debate or contrasting viewpoints
- Keywords: "perspectives", "validate", "blindspots", "assumptions", "debate", "critique", "examine", "multi-angle", "expert opinion"

## Core Concepts

### Dynamic Expert Generation

Unlike fixed expert panels, this skill generates experts contextually relevant to each proposition:

- **Domain Experts (2)**: Direct specialists in the proposition's field, providing depth
- **Adjacent Experts (1-2)**: Specialists in related but distinct fields, providing breadth
- **Contrarian Expert (1)**: Those likely to challenge the proposition, providing critical perspective
- **Meta Expert (1)**: Methodologists, epistemologists, or systems thinkers, providing macro view

### Three Analysis Modes

1. **Validation Mode**: Find blindspots, hidden assumptions, and potential counterarguments
2. **Comprehensive Analysis Mode**: Each expert provides detailed perspective
3. **Debate Mode**: Experts engage in structured dialogue with opposing views

## Workflow

### Phase 1: Proposition Intake

**Extract and clarify the proposition**:

1. Identify the core claim or thesis
2. Detect domain(s) involved (technology, philosophy, business, science, etc.)
3. Assess complexity level (simple assertion vs. multi-faceted thesis)
4. Note any implicit assumptions visible in the framing

**Present understanding to user**:

```
I understand your proposition as:

"[Restate the proposition in clear language]"

Related domains: [Domain 1], [Domain 2], [Domain 3]
Implicit assumptions: [Assumptions