Back to Skills

literature-gap

verified

Identify research gaps from systematic literature reviews. Use when: (1) Completing literature reviews, (2) Justifying new studies, (3) Grant proposal development, (4) Dissertation planning, (5) Identifying future research directions.

View on GitHub

Marketplace

research-assistant-marketplace

astoreyai/ai_scientist

Plugin

research-assistant

productivity

Repository

astoreyai/ai_scientist
3stars

skills/literature-gap/SKILL.md

Last Verified

January 20, 2026

Install Skill

Select agents to install to:

Scope:
npx add-skill https://github.com/astoreyai/ai_scientist/blob/main/skills/literature-gap/SKILL.md -a claude-code --skill literature-gap

Installation paths:

Claude
.claude/skills/literature-gap/
Powered by add-skill CLI

Instructions

# Literature Gap Identification Skill

## Purpose
Systematically identify and prioritize research gaps from literature synthesis.

## Types of Research Gaps

**1. Knowledge Gaps**
- Phenomenon not yet studied
- Understudied populations
- Unexplored contexts

**2. Methodological Gaps**
- Lack of rigorous designs (RCTs)
- Limited longitudinal studies
- Need for mixed methods

**3. Theoretical Gaps**
- Competing theories not tested
- Mechanisms not understood
- Mediators/moderators unexplored

**4. Practice Gaps**
- Interventions not tested
- Implementation not studied
- Scalability unknown

**5. Evidence Quality Gaps**
- High risk of bias in existing studies
- Small sample sizes
- Inconsistent results needing resolution

## Gap Analysis Process

1. **Synthesize Findings**: What do we know?
2. **Identify Limitations**: What are the weaknesses?
3. **Find Patterns**: What's consistently missing?
4. **Prioritize**: Which gaps are most important?
5. **Justify**: Why does this gap matter?

## Example

**Research Area:** Mindfulness interventions for anxiety

**Gaps Identified:**
1. Few studies in adolescent populations (knowledge gap)
2. Lack of active control comparisons (methodological gap)
3. Mechanisms of action unclear (theoretical gap)
4. No implementation studies in schools (practice gap)
5. High attrition rates not addressed (evidence quality gap)

**Prioritized Gap:** Adolescent populations with active controls
- Feasible, high impact, fills critical knowledge void

---
**Version:** 1.0.0

Validation Details

Front Matter
Required Fields
Valid Name Format
Valid Description
Has Sections
Allowed Tools
Instruction Length:
1500 chars