Patterns for analyzing Jira ticket quality and identifying improvement opportunities.
View on GitHubplugins/aai-pm-jira/skills/jira-ticket-analysis/SKILL.md
February 1, 2026
Select agents to install to:
npx add-skill https://github.com/the-answerai/alphaagent-team/blob/main/plugins/aai-pm-jira/skills/jira-ticket-analysis/SKILL.md -a claude-code --skill jira-ticket-analysisInstallation paths:
.claude/skills/jira-ticket-analysis/# Jira Ticket Analysis Skill This skill provides methodology for analyzing Jira ticket quality and identifying areas for improvement. ## Quality Dimensions ### 1. Clarity **Questions to assess**: - Is the goal obvious from the summary? - Is the description free of jargon? - Would a new team member understand this? - Are acronyms explained? **Scoring**: - 5: Crystal clear, no questions needed - 4: Clear with minor ambiguity - 3: Understandable but needs context - 2: Confusing, multiple interpretations - 1: Cannot understand the request ### 2. Completeness **Questions to assess**: - Are acceptance criteria defined? - Is the scope clear (what's in/out)? - Are dependencies listed? - Is technical context provided? **Scoring**: - 5: All information present, ready to implement - 4: Minor details missing - 3: Key information missing but discoverable - 2: Significant gaps - 1: Missing most required information ### 3. Actionability **Questions to assess**: - Can work start immediately? - Are blockers identified and addressed? - Is the scope achievable? - Are success criteria measurable? **Scoring**: - 5: Can start now with confidence - 4: One small clarification needed - 3: Some research/clarification needed - 2: Blocked or unclear how to proceed - 1: Cannot start without major discovery ### 4. Context **Questions to assess**: - Is the "why" explained? - Is user impact described? - Are related tickets linked? - Is there technical background? **Scoring**: - 5: Full context, understand importance - 4: Good context, minor gaps - 3: Basic context provided - 2: Little context, unclear importance - 1: No context, don't know why this matters --- ## Analysis Process ### Step 1: Initial Read - Read summary and description - Note first impressions - Identify obvious issues ### Step 2: Score Dimensions Rate each dimension 1-5 and note specific issues: ```markdown | Dimension | Score | Issues | |-----------|-------|--------| | Clarity | 3 | Acronyms undefined, vague scope