Guides scientific hypothesis development and testing methodology. Use when formulating research questions, developing testable hypotheses, designing experiments, or evaluating research approaches. Triggers on phrases like "hypothesis", "test if", "experiment design", "research question", "how would I test", "is it true that".
View on GitHubpoemswe/co-researcher
co-researcher
January 24, 2026
Select agents to install to:
npx add-skill https://github.com/poemswe/co-researcher/blob/main/skills/hypothesis-testing/SKILL.md -a claude-code --skill hypothesis-testingInstallation paths:
.claude/skills/hypothesis-testing/# Hypothesis Testing Workflow This skill guides you through rigorous hypothesis development and testing methodology. ## Phase 1: Observation and Question ### Starting Point Analysis - What observation or phenomenon prompted this inquiry? - What patterns or anomalies are you seeing? - What existing knowledge is relevant? ### Research Question Formulation Good research questions are: - **Focused**: Specific enough to answer - **Researchable**: Can be investigated empirically - **Complex**: Requires analysis, not just facts - **Arguable**: Has multiple possible answers ### Question Types | Type | Example | Hypothesis Style | |------|---------|------------------| | Descriptive | "What is X?" | Not hypothesis-driven | | Relational | "Is X related to Y?" | Correlation hypothesis | | Causal | "Does X cause Y?" | Causal hypothesis | | Comparative | "Is X different from Y?" | Difference hypothesis | **CHECKPOINT**: Confirm research question with user. ## Phase 2: Hypothesis Construction ### Hypothesis Components ``` If [independent variable/condition] Then [dependent variable/outcome] Because [theoretical mechanism] ``` ### Null vs Alternative Hypothesis - **H₀ (Null)**: No effect/relationship exists - **H₁ (Alternative)**: Effect/relationship exists Example: - H₀: Training method has no effect on performance - H₁: Training method improves performance ### Hypothesis Quality Check - [ ] Is it testable with available methods? - [ ] Is it falsifiable (can be proven wrong)? - [ ] Does it make specific predictions? - [ ] Is it parsimonious (simplest explanation)? - [ ] Is it consistent with existing knowledge? - [ ] Does it specify the mechanism? ## Phase 3: Variable Mapping ### Variable Identification | Variable | Type | Operationalization | |----------|------|-------------------| | [Name] | Independent (IV) | [How measured/manipulated] | | [Name] | Dependent (DV) | [How measured] | | [Name] | Control | [How held constant] | | [Name] | Confound | [Potential interfer