conversation-analysis

# Conversation Analysis

Signal extraction → pattern detection → behavioral insights.

<when_to_use>

- User requests conversation analysis
- Identifying frustration, success, or workflow patterns
- Extracting user preferences and requirements
- Understanding task evolution and iterations

NOT for: real-time monitoring, content generation, single message analysis

</when_to_use>

<signal_taxonomy>

| Type | Subtype | Indicators |
|------|---------|------------|
| Success | Explicit Praise | "Perfect!", "Exactly what I needed", exclamation marks |
| Success | Continuation | "Now do the same for...", building on prior work |
| Success | Adoption | User implements suggestion without modification |
| Success | Acceptance | "Looks good", "Ship it", "Merge this" |
| Frustration | Correction | "No, I meant...", "That's wrong", "Do X instead" |
| Frustration | Reversion | User undoes agent changes, "Go back" |
| Frustration | Repetition | Same request 2+ times, escalating specificity |
| Frustration | Explicit | "This isn't working", "Why did you...", accusatory tone |
| Workflow | Sequence | "First...", "Then...", "Finally...", numbered lists |
| Workflow | Transition | "Now that X is done, let's Y", phase changes |
| Workflow | Tool Chain | Recurring tool usage patterns (Read → Edit → Bash) |
| Workflow | Context Switch | Abrupt topic changes, no transition language |
| Request | Prohibition | "Don't use X", "Never do Y", "Avoid Z" |
| Request | Requirement | "Always check...", "Make sure to...", "You must..." |
| Request | Preference | "I prefer...", "It's better to...", comparative language |
| Request | Conditional | "If X then Y", "When A, do B", situational rules |

Confidence levels:
- High (0.8–1.0): Explicit keywords match taxonomy, no ambiguity, strong context
- Medium (0.5–0.79): Implicit signal, partial context, minor ambiguity
- Low (0.2–0.49): Ambiguous language, weak context, borderline classification

</signal_taxonomy>

<phases>

Track with TodoWrite. Phas